Why Israel-Turkey Relations will not Change




By Elad Uzan*

Unlike  diplomatic crises that often occur between friendly nations, the crisis between  Israel and Turkey does not stem from a direct act or the result of an omission  on the part of Israel. We all remember the mess following the Australian Passports snarl (and more recently, the Zygier affair) and the like; in these diplomatic crises, countries  choose to cooperate to end the story quickly. The matter at hand is totally  different.

Over  the last decade, Turkish citizens chose an Islamist leadership and has turned  from a friendly to a hostile country. The rise to power in 2002 of the Islamic  Party marks an ideological process that is similar (though not identical) to  that of the Ayatollah regime which came to power in Iran in 1979. The Israeli  apology to Turkey, accordingly, fell on the ears of a person with a worldview closer to that of Ahmadinejad than the Australian prime  minister.

In  order to understand the current crisis between Israel and Turkey, firstly we should  understand the source for Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ideological teachings and deep hatred of Israel, Jews, and  Zionism. Two months after the “Justice and Development Party” (AKP) came to  power, a valued pundit for the Hürriyet daily published an article in  which he wrote: “Did you know that in 1974, when Erdogan was president of the  ‘young Muslims’ in Istanbul, which was the young guard of Erbakan’s National  Salvation Party, he wrote a play entitled “Mskoiamh”, which stands for  Freemasons, Communists, and Jews? The message was in the combination of the  three hateful satanic elements. The play was performed all over  Turkey.”

Earlier,  in 1969, the same Necmettin Erbakan (In those days he was still a novice  politician; later, the first Islamist prime minister) published a political  manifesto, which he dubbed Millî Görüş, (National Vision). This  manifesto reflects the credo of an Islamic political organization also called  Millî Görüş, which has become a hotbed of several Islamic parties, and one of  the largest Islamic organizations in Europe. Erbakan identified Turkey’s  national decline as deriving from Turkey’s futile attempts to mimic the Western  way of life. The solution, so he preached, was to gradually disengage from the  West and from the EU (which he saw as “Zionist” and “Catholic”), while replacing  them with economic cooperation with  Islamic countries. In 2007, as part of his Islamist Happiness Party election  campaign, he stated publicly that “The Zionists [meaning the Jews and E.U] want to  control from Morocco to Indonesia […] for 300 years two hundred nations of the  world are controlled by one center, imperialist and racist Zionism. To diagnose  this disease which aims to destroy the world’s happiness, we have to diagnose  its origins”. He further stated that Zionism is a “bacteria” and that the Jews  derive their enormous power from their dominance in international organizations. Earlier, in an article published in 2005, the daily Milli  Gazette (affiliated with Millî Görüş), claimed that “Judaism is synonymous  with treachery”. Throughout the history, it was argued, the Turks helped the  Jews — but they, “like insects, gnawed in the Ottoman [Empire], and if that is  not enough, they stabbed the Turkish soldiers in Palestine in their backs”  .

“Bacteria,”  “insects,” “world domination,” “international organizations,” “knife in the  back;” there is no need to specify where these images are taken from. That is,  indeed, Erdogan’s ideology: Seeing Judaism (or “Zionism”) not just as a  worldwide conspiracy, but as an historical conspiracy to rule the world spanning  centuries, and the belief that Christianity (and in particular, Catholicism),  Freemasonry, and Communism are “Jewish” (or “Zionist”): that is, that they are  the “public face” of the ongoing international Jewish conspiracy to rule the  world, in different eras. Both of these views are not only common in Nazi  propaganda, they are Nazi propaganda’s two central pillars, and what’s more,  what Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler and so on apparently really believed themselves,  motivating and justifying their actions. Indeed, these two ideas are not  original with Hitler — they were invented by late 19th-century German and  British racists.

Erdogan  and Turkish President Abdullah Gul were educated within this political framework  introduced by Erbakan. But despite Erbakan’s success in being appointed prime  minister in 1997, he failed to realize his Islamist vision. The Constitutional  Court and the military, the custodians of secularism in Turkey, removed him from  power. December 2002 marked the revolution: against the background of the  economic crisis, Erdogan’s Islamist “Justice and Development Party” won in a  landslide. Five years later, Abdullah Gul was elected vice president; this time,  supporters of secularism in parliament have failed miserably.

Now,  in light of Erdogan’s ideological roots — a man who himself was  convicted by a Turkish court on charges of religious  inciting — it is easy to understand why he characterized Israel’s struggle  against Hamas as “state terrorism,” along with his despicable behavior towards President Peres in Davos, the worldwide  incitement against Israel during “Cast Lead” (and most recently in Operation  “Pillar of Cloud”); and the Turkish Gaza  flotilla — which was designed and executed by a terrorist organization and with  the full backing of Ankara. Even his statement from last February that Zionism  is a crime against humanity is just more of the same.

So  what to do? First, the glory days of Israel’s relations with Turkey will not  return to what they were as long as Erdogan’s Islamist party is in power — and  no apology will change that. But we must see the rift in a much wider  perspective: it is a cultural and religious struggle, not only a question of  national honor: political Islam versus the West and its values. The West must  clear its throat and defend itself.

* Elad  Uzan is a jurist and conducts research at the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya  (IDC) in Israel. He writes about law, culture, philosophy and Middle East  issues. [email protected]

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/05/why_israel-turkey_relations_will_not_change.html#ixzz2UeBHH3oq

Hellasjournal - Newsletter


%d bloggers like this: